Monday, October 5, 2009

Readings

The first reading had so much power to it telling you a story without boring you or talking too much. This man took in someone who had been through so much and listened to his story and put it so simply into a poem. Even though he told the story from his point of view it was really about the General’s experience in the Vietnam War. He was descriptive in making him stand out as an individual and believe that you would recognize him straight away if you met him in real life. He brought life to the words he used to explain the life of this man in only a short piece of work. The purpose of Dr. Harrington’s poem was to explain the life of General Apache and the process of writing it, through understanding the turmoil of his life, putting it all on paper and showing his true colors as he wishes to be seen as.

The writer William Zinsser makes a point of how today’s society uses to many words and “clutters” a piece of work and how simplicity is becoming less and less noticeable. He calls it a “disease” and how no one can understand what you’re trying to say. He believes in simplicity and compares it to how hard writing can be. He says “very few sentences come out right the first time, or even the third time… if you find writing is hard, it’s because it is hard.” He uses examples that we can relate with like pilots saying it’s going to rain in the most elaborate way possible. He doesn’t blame the reader for being stupid, just not careful enough to not paying attention to each word and how it relates to the piece of writing. Not only does he use examples, but he uses them from his own life experience and how he felt about them. Even though we didn’t have the same happening as we did we can relate to the overall message that he is trying to establish. People writing today make it much more complicated than need be.

3 comments:

  1. After reading your response about "General Apache," it makes me want to read the essay again. I didn't realize before how descriptive Harrington was of General Apache. I also really agree with your response to "Simplicity." I think that writing has become too complicated, so all three of us agree! I feel like unnecessarily complicated writing is just frustrating, do you feel the same way?

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I read Zinsser's piece, I thought, "This guy must be a journalist rather than an academic." Then I flipped the page to the introductory paragraph and sure enough, he is.

    Why do you think journalists value this straightforward communication, perhaps more than academics typically might?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the way you talked about simplicity and the voyage of the poem. It was completly different from the way I tried to do it, but after reading yours I wanted to go back and redo mine, because you made me think about the poem more then I had before. It really gave me a new view on it. The way you talked about it was definently interesting.

    ReplyDelete